Retrieval augmented generation integrates semantics-based document indexing and rertieval with the associative power of large language models (LLMs). The basic idea is best illustrated by a canonical use case. Consider a law firm with a large historical library of legal cases. The firm takes on a new case, and an assistant wishes to consult with an in-house AI agent on the matter. Before the AI agent responds, the RAG system kicks in: It retrieves some of the most relevant cases from the firm's library and provides these as context to the LLM. The LLM then responds to the user query using the retrieved information.
As it turns out, I had the perfect data set for a representative RAG implementation. Over the years, I offered well over 11,000 answers on Quora, mostly (albeit not exclusively) on the subject of theoretical physics. This was just too good an opportunity to pass up! Especially because Quora makes it possible to bulk download one's contributions, which made it easy to convert my answers to a form suitable for indexing.
The basic idea behind Retrieval Augmented Generation is simple. When you converse with an AI chatbot and ask a question, the AI chatbot consults a library of documents, retrieving the most relevant results. It then uses the content of these documents as it generates its answer.
What makes RAG particularly powerful is that the relevant documents are not selected by some naive algorithm such as a simple keyword search. Rather, they are classified in advance using an AI language model, and they are organized in a semantic database that representatively encodes the meaning and content. A popular representation is called FAISS, or Facebook AI Similarity Search: As the name implies, the method and corresponding software libraries were provided by Meta, the parent company of Facebook.
The reference implementation shown here is based on the over 11,000 mostly physics-themed answers I provided on the Quora question-and-answer Web site.
This implementation was constructed by first storing all answers in a conventional relational database. Next, a FAISS-compatible software library was used to create a semantic representation. This representation is exposed as an internal microservice for use by other components of our RAG implementation.
When the user enters a query, the query text is used to interrogate the FAISS microservice, which returns a set of hits in the form of database record references. The corresponding documents are then pulled from the database.
A special feature of our implementation is that the documents are not used as raw text. Rather, they are rendered and turned into PNG graphic page images. This ensures that in addition to the document text, their layout, diagrammatic content, and rendered mathematical expressions are faithfully preserved.
The document images are then attached to the user's original query, for processing by a locally run, on-premises text+vision AI model, specifically Google's Gemma: version 3 in particular, with approximately 12 billion model parameters at 4-bit quantization. A model this size is small enough to run efficiently on consumer-grade hardware, yet large enough to offer coherent responses even to complex queries. In our case, Gemma is run on an NVidia 5060 Ti GPU, with 16 gigabytes of on-card VRAM. This step completes the pipeline: the result, along with links to the referenced documents, is presented to the user.
The information stored in the semantic (FAISS) database can also be visualized. A particularly powerful visualization method is called UMAP (Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection): an efficient, effective method to "project" the abstract, high-dimensional mathematical space that is the FAISS semantic representation into a two-dimensional "cloud" of projections. Our implementation also includes just such a projection, in the form of an interactive visualization, with clickable points and popups that contain the documents in question.
The reference implementation demonstrated here is "production ready" and deployable.